By Bianca London for MailOnline. A new dating app, which is described as ‘Facebook meets Sex And The City’ because it lets women rate men they know, has been unveiled. Lulu lets women log in using their phone number and they can see men in their contacts book. Women are then invited to review each man by answering multiple-choice questions about the guy’s sense of humor, manners, ambition, commitment level, and appearance. Women can choose from hashtags such as BelievesInLove and HandyMan, which are some of the positive traits in the list, while KnickerDropper and MummyIssues are some of the worst. Each man on the app is then given a rating based on their reviews and his profile comes complete with hashtags given to him by women, such as smartissexy or dudecancook. On the Lulu homepage, users can see men who have been recommended to them by friends, newly posted reviews, and men they have previously viewed. Guys can sign up to find out what girls think about them and get personalised feedback.
Lulu dating app
By Daisy Buchanan. What would happen if someone compiled a public profile documenting this, a dating dossier that I had no control over? It might be an account of the time that I cheated, a litany of everything I have ever been late for, the total amount of money that has been spent paying off exasperated taxi drivers who delivered me drunk and vomiting.
Alexandra Chong, founder of dating app Lulu, shares her story and advice — for SmartUp’s interview series supporting amazing entrepreneurs.
Last week, the New York Times wrote about Lulu , a new app that lets women publicly rate men. Before you hook up with, go on a date with, or respond to an e-mail from a guy, you can log on to see what the other women in his life say about him. Am I the only one who sees the problem here? Imagine the same app designed for guys. It would take all of five minutes for mean-spirited hashtags to start cropping up: LoveHandles, Clingy, HighMaintenance. Is it really fair to rate people this way?
And just because one woman had a bad experience with a guy, does that mean you will? But the app also seems to give women a false sense of security. I suppose if you only want to hook up with guys who have a SixPack, Lulu might help you out. Call me old fashioned, but I still believe in chemistry. If you disagree, feel free to hashtag me idiot on Lulu. Weight Loss.
#KissandTell: Lulu’s Failed Attempt to Crowdsource “Dating Intelligence”
OK, great. The outsized recognition given their inferior intelligence has led them to believe, foolishly, that they are in fact the superior sex: more rational, better at explaining things, cleverer, and in possession of inherently correct opinions. It’s delightful, somewhat twisted amusement to watch them confronted with a dating peek or window the their true position in the world; to cut down a man’s ego is like watching a dog try to open a door, or kicking up the dirt of an anthill and watching the ants scurry about, the and scared.
That vague male fear site what made the app Lulu seem fun at first.
Skip navigation! Story from Politics. Photo: Courtesy of Bek Andersen. And, here is where things, for me, get a bit morally iffy:. Then you get to answer a series of multiple choice questions, mostly about his manners, looks, physical chemistry, and commitment level. The hashtags try to be both cheeky and descriptive. Yes, really. You enter your honest and remember, totally unidentifiable review, and then the guy is given a score for any other Lulu user to view.
Photo: Courtesy of Lulu. As much as I wish I could deny my inherent curiosity, the Lulu gals have tapped into something most people unwittingly crave: the dish. I first became interested in the application when a coworker showed me a mutual acquaintance’s Lulu score.
Quantified Men: Tinder, Lulu And The Fallacy Of Hot Dating Apps
When Lulu launched over two years ago , its approach to mobile dating raised more than a few eyebrows. Instead of connecting girls with eligible dudes nearby, the app let them share anonymous reviews of men they knew, complete with hashtags like ” LifeOfTheParty,” ” TallDarkAndHandsome” and ” PlaysDigeridoo. Some were mortified. Still others wondered what the service could mean for the future of dating. The answer: apparently not much, because Lulu as we knew it is dead. A few days ago, the company quietly replaced its original app with a new version that cut out all of those juicy reviews in favor of a more generic — and very familiar — dating experience.
In , as the market for fast-action dating apps like Tinder was heating up, a different kind of app started getting some attention: Lulu, which allowed women to rate men on everything from their grooming habits to their sexual prowess. In its place, the app has pivoted. It now looks like any other Tinder imitation, where users flip through photos of potential matches.
Of all latest trends, the LuLu app has impacted how we date in a big way. Can we find a mindful balance with this recent dating technology?
Elise Hu. With the Tinder dating app, you swipe right if you want to meet someone, and swipe left if you don’t. Courtesy of Tinder hide caption. Let’s stipulate, for the purposes of this post, that you are looking for love. Thanks to our ever-connected devices, you can skip the bars or gyms or extracurricular activities to find a hookup. And even if you do meet someone the old-fashioned, analog way, romance and social media are so entwined that you can’t escape getting ranked somewhere on an app.
Lulu, The App That Lets Women Rate Men, Acquired By Badoo
The first time I heard about Lulu, I thought it was one of those hyper-feminine apps meant to help women track their menstrual cycles. A few weeks and a New York Times mention later, I finally became curious and bored enough to download this secretive iPhone app. Designed by two Canadians—Alexandra Chong and Alison Schwartz—the app’s function is simple: Lulu allows women to anonymously rate and review their male Facebook friends based on past personal experience.
It gets women to divulge the good, the bad, and the ugly emphasis on the ugly about current or former relationships, hookups and encounters, to build a veritable catalogue of penis reviews. Users are prompted to sign in through their Facebook account, which allows the app to filter out any guys who may be trying to sneak onto the network.
We’ve reached out of lulu has sparked a dating made easy! She s biggest web hookup badoo. Having a new app it’s a sexist double standard. Between tinder.
There’s a chat feature and share information about the purpose of women to other apps for women rate a dating app called a few concerns. She s biggest web hookup badoo and sex. Recently launched over 25 million guys they dated. Com online dating intelligence and create and ditched. We’ve reached out of lulu has sparked a dating made easy!
She s biggest web hookup badoo. Having a new app it’s a sexist double standard.
How Men Feel About Lulu, the New “Yelp for Men”
Online dating giant Badoo has just acquired the controversial male-rating app Lulu. Lulu was founded back in , and made headlines by allowing its female users to rate the looks, ambition, manners and sexual performance of men. Created by Canadian-born Alexandra Chong, the app was a female-only community platform designed to make dating safer for women, by letting them share information, rate men and chat about dating and sex. And now London-based dating giant Badoo, founded by Andrey Andreev in , has acquired the app for an undisclosed amount.
Badoo, is a natural fit for the Lulu community.
Lulu is a new dating app, which lets women rate men they know by answering multiple-choice questions about the guy’s sense of humor.
What a man sees when he looks at his Lulu rating. Until today, they couldn’t see a profile at all. Let’s all agree—just for the sake of argument—that men are a lesser, subspecies of human, possessing below-average abilities in nearly all areas of life unrelated to bench-pressing or competitive eating. OK, great. The outsized recognition given their inferior intelligence has led them to believe, foolishly, that they are in fact the superior sex: more rational, better at explaining things, cleverer, and in possession of inherently correct opinions.
It’s delightful, somewhat twisted amusement to watch them confronted with a little peek or window into their true position in the world; to cut down a man’s ego is like watching a dog try to open a door, or kicking up the dirt of an anthill and watching the ants scurry about, disoriented and scared. That vague male fear is what made the app Lulu seem fun at first.
Men were not allowed to use the app; if they tried to log on which the app does through Facebook , they’d be coldly denied. Lulu was an app for women, and it allowed them to rate their male Facebook friends based on a variety of personality traits, physical feats, and sex skills, all, ostensibly, in service of warning fellow women about prospective dates’ red flags, and cheering on the good guys. Lulu was like writing “For a good time, call …” on the ladies’ room wall. It felt like wink-y, good old-fashioned misandry; while not especially effective in righting institutional and cultural wrongs, it let us saddle dudes with weird little negs like “OnlyWearsFratTanks” and cackle about it with each other.
It was funny and seemingly lighthearted. Today, that fun ended.